Background
Garlic
mustard (Alliaria petiolata) was once considered one of the most problematic
plant invaders in eastern temperate forests. Declines in native plant species
diversity and deterioration in general forest health were attributed to
advancing garlic mustard. The lack of success in controlling the species
resulted in the initiation of research to develop a biological control program.
While ecological investigations were pursued, chemical, and often physical removal
programs continued (including “garlic mustard challenges”). At the same time
researchers established long term permanent monitoring plots in preparation for
potential insect releases. In these plots the abundance of seedlings, rosettes
and adult stems, stem height, reproductive output and herbivory were recorded.
New Evidence
Monitoring
of garlic mustard at many sites across the Northeast and Midwest in these
permanent plots has shown that over time adult density, rosette density, stem
height and the number of siliques is greatly reduced to an extent where garlic
mustard, while present, is reduced to extremely low abundance (Fig. 1). These
results occur at all sites. Additional work using soil sterilization has shown
that these effects are, most likely, explained by negative soil feedback, i.e.
the build-up of soil microbial communities that selectively suppress garlic
mustard (other plant species appear unaffected). We are currently preparing
these results with our collaborators for publication in the peer reviewed literature.
Fig. 1. Garlic mustard adult density,
rosette density, stem height and the number of siliques over time (since
establishment of monitoring plots). Data are pooled from multiple sites in NY
and IL.
Recommendations
We are aware
that many organizations and communities are gearing up for another season of
garlic mustard removal, often dubbed “garlic mustard challenges”. The most
recent ecological work has shown that effects attributed to garlic mustard
invasion are more likely effects of invasive earthworms and abundant native
white-tailed deer. Garlic mustard will only be able to invade and establish
populations in areas, which have been colonized by earthworms. Removing garlic
mustard will not help to restore thriving native communities. In fact, removing
garlic mustard will set back the “self-inflicted” population declines by
preventing negative soil feedback. Only in places where garlic mustard is not
controlled will the species decline rapidly (often within 5-10 years after
initial invasion, but more observations are needed). We recommend stopping all
active garlic mustard removal (unless initial invasions can be stopped by
removing a few individuals away from well-established populations) and instead
focusing on planting native species. Native species will need to be protected
from deer herbivory behind fences or in cages until deer populations are
sufficiently reduced. Please be aware that garlic mustard will continue to
spread to areas where the species has not occurred previously. The decline in
population and vigor is a function of residence time.
Very interesting! I have been pulling garlic mustard on my and 3 acres for the past 5 years, this has been an incredibly labor intensive process. I've had increased difficulty getting all the plants because I've noticed they are becoming smaller and harder to spot so your research is very interesting to me! I've also observed that my neighbors land has not become over populated and actually seem to have less garlic mustard than I do, despite the fact that none of them pull it. I've often wondered if I'm doing more harm than good by pulling the garlic mustard and disturbing the soil. This year I decided to abandon my efforts since they have not been effective and see how it all plays out.
ReplyDelete